Using Google Documents in Teaching
Using Google Documents in Teaching
Debating as
a teaching method is a strategy that involves a process of, firstly, allowing
pupils time to research and construct an argument regarding a certain topic.
They will then be required to present this argument to the opposing team, by
listening carefully to the defensive opinions and finding the relevant
information from their research to ‘argue back’. (Darby, 2007)
As mentioned in the previous blog
post, as a class we have recently spent a seminar debating with another group
online using Google Documents. We spent the first part of the lesson
researching and forming our argument as a group, before logging onto Google Documents
to ‘argue’ with the other class. I found this session very engaging and I am now
going to explore the idea of using this in teaching.
One of the
main benefits of using debating as a teaching source is that it fully engages
the pupils to argue the points that the opposing group are coming up with,
which therefore enhances their ability to form a critical argument
(Fandos-Herrera, 2017). I found that one of the most positive aspects of this
session was that the idea of debating live against our peers meant that we were
really motivated to come together as a group and actually make an effort with
the points that we were arguing. I also found that myself and many other
members of my group, who may normally be fairly quiet in seminars, really
wanted to work hard to research and get involved.
Furthermore,
it has been found that students involved in a study, which involved asking them
questions on a topic both before and after taking part in a debate on the
topic, reported that their knowledge on a topic was significantly higher after
participating in a debate on that topic within their class. However, 88.5% of
the participants in this study were female, meaning that we cannot be certain
that debating is as beneficial for male students. (Kennedy, 2009)
Despite the
clear evidence behind this teaching method, the use of debates in education is often
only limited to those students who are part of debating societies and clubs
(Bellon, 2000). One explanation for this is the criticism that debates in
education only highlight two possible arguments, ignoring the fact that there
are usually more than two viewpoints of any topic (Tumposky). However, this
problem could easily be rectified by splitting the class into more than two ‘teams’
during debates. The class could be split into as many different teams as there
are arguments in the debate.
Another potential issue is that debating,
particularly in primary schools, could encourage a level of competition in the
classroom that may lead to more negative situations. Competitive attitudes can
be associated with bullying in the classroom (Sutton, 2000) and younger children
may carry these debates, or the teams used in a debate, into the playground, causing
conflict and arguments.
On the
other hand, this does not mean that older children (Key Stage 3 or possibly 2)
cannot benefit from debating in lessons. To conclude, it is clear that students
learn the most when using their knowledge in context and debating gives them a
perfect opportunity to do this (Meyers & Jones, 1993).
References
Darby, M. (2007). Debate: A teaching-learning strategy for developing
competence in communication and critical thinking. American Dental Hygienists
Association, 81(4), 78-78.
Fandos-Herrera, C., Jiménez-Martínez, J., Orús, C., & Pina, J.
(2017). Introducing the discussant role to stimulate debate in the classroom:
Effects on interactivity, learning outcomes, satisfaction and attitudes. Studies in Higher Education, 1-17.
Kennedy, Ruth R. (2009). The Power of In-Class Debates. Active Learning in Higher Education, 10(3), 225-236.
Meyers, C., & Jones, T. (1993). Promoting active learning:
Strategies for the college classroom. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Sutton, J., & Keogh, E. (2000). Social competition in school:
Relationships with bullying, Machiavellianism and personality. British Journal of Educational
Psychology, 70(3), 443-456.
Tumposky, N. (2004). The debate debate. Clearing House, 78(2), 52-55.
Comments
Post a Comment