Cross Curricula
In this blog post we shall be exploring why cross curricula
is so important within education establishments and the benefits the students
get from it. We need to ask ourselves as professionals do we stick to the
traditional way of teaching or do we need to utilise and make links with other
subjects to help the pupils.
According
to (Plowden, 1967, p555) Stress that children’s learning does not fit
into subject categories’ and this was 50 years ago and only know are we getting
to a point where we are linking other subjects together and this is where Donaldson
who is recommending the Welsh government on curriculum reforms to improve our educational
system here in Wales and wants to see more cross-curricula links within todays
education to prepare them better for the workplace of the future. This is why Eisner
(1996) blame this way of thinking for a diminution of children’s knowledge of
which is very true and could have been rectified some decades back and not left
until now. Other modern curriculums are reviewing this and want to see cross
curricula links.
Many critics argue that this would be the key to release the creative
side of a child’s learning. Hus
and Grmek (2011, p. 160) besides acquiring new knowledge the emphasis in what
they call project lessons is also on motivation and acquiring practical
knowledge and developing social learning.
If we have a look at a project that Finland has lead in one of its schools and
look at the process they undergo but see how many cross curricula links they
are making without having the traditional way of having subjects separated. Their teacher is taking them through a video re-enactment - shown on the
classroom's interactive smart board - of the day Mount Vesuvius erupted and
destroyed the city of Pompeii.
In groups they take out their mini laptops. Their task is to compare
ancient Rome with modern Finland. One group looks at Roman baths and today's
luxury spas; another puts the Colosseum up against modern-day stadiums. This is
a history lesson with a difference, says Aleksis Stenholm, a teacher at Hauho
Comprehensive School. The children are also gaining skills in technology,
research, communication and cultural understanding.
"Each group is becoming an expert on their subject, which they will
present to the class," he explains. The board game is the culmination of
the project, which will run alongside normal classroom teaching. (BBC News,
2017) That is one example of how they link different subjects and concentrating
on many different skills and linking them together. Finland is one of the best
countries in the world for education and score very high in the PISA rankings
and it shows their pupils, educators, parents etc think it will work for them
and the future for their country.
If we view education at the moment children entering education today
will start to enter the workforce around 2030 and we need to think as educators
what skills will they need? At the moment our curriculum doesn’t meet the needs
of what we need for the workplace of the future. Within the blog post I have
included a picture of what critical skills we need by 2020 which was produced
by University of Phoenix and most of these skills aren’t included in our out of
date curriculum.
‘Schools need to embrace cross curricular learning, and move away from
reform that positions subjects in ways that hark back to some imagined past,
rather than forwards to more globalised times’ (Power, 2002, p. 103). We need
to revamp our curriculum and especially with what Donaldson is proposing in his
new curriculum design that again we need to review and make as many cross
curricula links as possible. The essential features of a
curriculum devised in 1988 reflect a world that was yet to see the World Wide
Web and
the advances in technology and globalisation that have transformed the way we
live and work. These changes have profound implications for what, and how,
children and young people need to learn during the period of their statutory
education. The curriculum, then, has
become overloaded, complicated and, in parts, outdated.
‘At the
heart of the educational process lies the child’ (Plowden, 1967, p.9) We again
need to make sure the child is at the heart of the educational process as that
is why we have education in the first place for them to adapt and have the
required skills for their future workplace and adapt to new advances when
required.
“Subject
progression is difficult to achieve, even when only two subjects are involved;
it is almost impossible with three or more.” Barnes. J (2012) Saying that we
need to have as many cross curricula links as possible with different subject areas,
but we have also got to make sure we have a balance for teachers as we don’t
want them over worked with too much preparation and the stress. A review of the
current National Curriculum has been taken and recommendations of how we can
improve are in progress.
A
curricular approach which maximises the use of the widest range of mental and
physical faculties is likely to be more effective than one which only uses
some. Neuroscientists have argued that for learning to be successful teachers
must ensure… (Barnes, 2011, p.137)
·
There must be challenge
·
Provide positive learning experiences
·
Provide multi-layered experiences
·
Must stimulate the senses.
We also
have neuroscience backing up this approach for education. – Which provides the
best result for the learners. (Alexander, 2010) makes a very good point that repetition
also significantly helps us to memorise more easily. It is very important to do
it more than once to get better at that skill or to reinforce existing
knowledge.
To finish
we just need to remember that Any changes to the curriculum should be made with the main goal of
education in mind (Lawson et al, 2007) that is crucial to making sure we
are preparing and having educated individuals to adapt, have the skills necessary
to adapt and be ready to take on new challenges. We have reviewed certain
aspects of why cross curricula is good and backed by science but also the dangers
of too much cross curricula but most importantly teachers need to be given the
tools so helping them adapt and improve before any changes are implemented so
then it will benefit the students.
References:
- .Plowden, Lady Bridget. (1967). Children and Their Primary schools: A report of the Central Advisory Council for Education, Volume 1. London: HMSO.
·
Barnes, J. (2011). Cross-curricular learning 3-14 (2nd ed.). Los
Angeles, [Calif.] ; London: SAGE.
- Barnes, J., and Shirley, I. (2007). Strangely familiar: cross curricular and creative thinking in teacher education, Improving schools, v
- BBC News. (2017). Could subjects soon be history in Finland?. [online] Available at: http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-europe-39889523# [Accessed 9 Dec. 2017]
·
Eisner, E. (1996). Cognition and the
Curriculum Re-considered (2nd Edn). London. PCP.
- Pollard, A. (ed.) (2010). Professionalism and Pedagogy: A contemporary Opportunity: A commentary by TLRP and GTCE. London: TLRP.
Hi just wondering do you have the full reference for this statement "Schools need to embrace cross curricular learning and move away from reform that positions subjects in ways that hark back to some imagined past, rather than forward to more globalized times" by Power? Thank you
ReplyDelete