The purpose of Education
This post shall outline my pedagogical beliefs and
my views on the purpose of primary education.
"Pedagogy is about more than 'teaching' in the
narrow sense of methods used in the classroom. It represents the considered
selection of those methods in light of the purposes of the curriculum and the
needs and developmental stage of the children and young people".
(Donaldson, 2015, p.63).
I believe there are many pedagogy styles that
should be used in the classroom to ensure that all children and their
individual needs are met and they meet their full potential in education.
Learning by discovery is a way that children can search for information
themselves, using the library, or the internet to find the information they
need and choose the relevant information. This helps the child gain
self-confidence and become self-directed. Discovery learning is defined
as being constructive form of learning, and self-managed. (de Jong & van
Joolingen, 1998). Constructivism is learning by being active and constructive.
It gives children the opportunity to create their own representations of
objective reality. Vygotsky's social development theory is one of the
foundations for constructivism. Vygotsky believed that learning was necessary
and universal aspect of the process of developing culturally organised,
specifically human psychological function. (Vygotsky, 1987). Vygotsky also
believed a child's learning occurred through social interaction with a skilled
tutor. I also feel learning by discovery allows children to discuss and debate
the information they have found, this will improve social interactions with in
the classroom and teach children valuable life skills. Learning by doing is
another pedagogy style that i feel children benefit from in the classroom and
daily life. Learning by doing is being active in learning and having a hands-on
approach.
By learning practically children get to practice
skills and test their knowledge. Dewey recognised the importance of active
learning in the classroom. "The teacher and the book are no longer the
only instructors; the hands, the eyes, the ears, in fact the whole body, become
sources of information, while teachers and textbooks become respectively the
starter and the tester. No book or map is a substitute for personal experience;
they cannot take the place of the actual journey". (Dewey,1962). Dewey
believed that children that go to school should be able to do things and live
in a community which give them real, guided experiences to contribute to
society. (Dewey,1963). Many of Dewey's ideas are still used today in education,
such as subjects such as maths, geography and history being taught actively and
using everyday life skills, such maths could be learnt through measuring in
cooking, or working out how long a journey would take. Dewey also believed that
education should take into account each individual child's need and abilities,
as every child is different. This is something I agree with, within pedagogy
when using a standard curriculum for all children there must be room for
adaption and different pedagogical methods to ensure every child's individual
needs are taken into account.
I believe the purpose of education is that
education is the development of skills, knowledge, and self-discipline. I
believe these are essential for twenty first century living in the real world,
and will help prepare children not only for school life but also becoming a
functional member of society.
Montessori's learning theories also have the same
aims and beliefs. She believed that for children to develop practical life
skills through linguistic exercises, sensory training and physical activities
are what children need to be equipped for practical life. (MM, p.62).
Montessori taught many life skills such as good nutrition and hygiene. She
believed it is very important that children develop skills and knowledge to
live in society, and develop self-discipline and independence. Montessori
considered discipline to be development of
self-mastery and motivation to continue their
learning process without the teacher's involvement. "Since the child now
learns to move rather than sit still, he prepares himself not only for school,
but for life: he becomes able, through habit and through practice, to perform
easily and correctly the simple acts of social or community life. The
discipline to which the child habituates himself here is, in its character, not
limited to the school environment but extends to society. (MM, p86-87).
Montessori thought by learning independence and practical life skills allows
children to become meaningful members of society. Piaget, like Montessori
believed that children developed in a progression sequences. They both believed
that free play was important for children to learn and explore, and that
children construct their own knowledge and not just learn it from adults.
Although their theories differ in many way, such as the actual development
sequence timing. Montessori believed that the most important years for a child
to learn are between birth and six years old, and that they learn from the
environment and people around them. Piaget's developmental sequence differs in
that he believed children did not really begin to learn until seven years
old.
I believe learning and knowledge begins at birth and would there fore agree more with Montessori, although where teaching methods are concerned I feel Piaget's methods are more appropriate, he believed that the curriculum and classes should be age appropriate, and he incorporated more social experiences with real life situations.
References
Dewey, J & Dewey, E. (1962): Schools of Tomorrow. New York:
Dutton.
Donaldson, G. (2015). Successful futures:
Independent review of curriculum and assessment arrangements in Wales. Welsh
Governement.
Jong,T. De & Joolingen, W.R van (1998).
Scientific discovery learning with computer similations of conceptual domains.
Review of Educational Research, (68), 179-202.
Montessori, M. (1965) Dr. Montessoris own handbook.
New York, NY: Schocken Books, Inc.
Vygotsky, L,S. (1987). Mind in Society: The
development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard
University Press.
Comments
Post a Comment